By Karen Huber, Local Contributor
512.797.9028
Christy Muse, Executive Director
Hill Country Alliance (christy@hillcountryalliance.org)
512.560.3135It’s not about the birds; “it’s about the economy, folks!” It’s about our “habitat” — the health of the human race not just that of the whooping cranes. The recent federal court ruling, faulting the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in the deaths of 23 endangered whooping cranes, directly relates to maintaining prosperity. The judge ruled that the agency has a statutory obligation to ensure enough fresh water flows downriver to the coast to provide viable habitat for critters like blue crabs, which sustain the whooping cranes – and ultimately us.
Fresh water mixing with salt water in the
estuaries of the Gulf Coast provides “brackish” water needed to maintain
nurseries for most gulf and ocean seafood. You can bet that if your favorite
seafood doesn’t breed in brackish water, it eats something that does. In fact,
97 percent of the Gulf of Mexico commercial seafood landings rely on estuaries
and wetlands to survive.
So why are elected officials such as Attorney
General Greg Abbott and Gov. Rick Perry’s former TCEQ appointee Kathleen
Hartnett White screaming foul over the rulings? Perhaps “the best defense is a
good offense.” The commission is responsible for administering most
environmental rules and regulations. Yet Abbott said TCEQ was not at fault
because the Austin headquarters was too far removed from the realities of crane
habitat to draw the link. Really? That is the agency’s job. What actually is at
stake is a political desire to promote business — at any cost.
Create jobs, sure, but not at the expense
of existing jobs and certainly not at the expense of an entire region’s
economic health.
The food chain from Texas bays and
estuaries generates more than $1 billion annually, including recreational
fishing and nature tourism — the fastest-growing segment of Texas’ tourism
industry. And, a 1997 study concluded healthy estuaries result in an overall
economic value rendered at $11,000 per acre per year, putting the annual value
of San Antonio Bay alone (the whooping cranes’ home) at more than $1.3 billion.
Political sorts screaming “We can’t let
birds take priority over human needs” just doesn’t hold water. So take note,
voters. Without understanding that sustainable life for the human species
relies in no small part on healthy rivers, oceans and sea life, we may be
letting short-term interests trump long-term prosperity.
Even more political is Abbott’s criticism
that the judge’s ruling prevents water reserved for environmental purposes from
being permitted for other uses. That charge is superficial. The law sets out
provisions for critical environmental flows, and in the current drought there
simply is not enough water for all those who want it. The judge appears to be
trying to put some “teeth” into an issue whose resolution has languished for
years. So, the issue gets dammed up in a legal mess including archaic laws
regarding priority water rights and other conflicting rules and regulations by
the plethora of water policymaking entities.
So what does a bird’s-eye view of this mess
offer? Those joining TCEQ in the lawsuit included big biz like the chemical
industry and river authorities representing regional interests who want more
residential and industrial growth. Water for residential use is needed, but an
important part of that equation is that the greatest percentage of residential
water use is for landscaping. What is more important, high-water-demand St.
Augustine lawns or healthy bird habitat that translates into healthy estuaries
and oceans?”
Don’t be fooled by political rhetoric
bemoaning birds as more important than people. It’s really all about people and
a prosperous future. Second, water policymaking in Texas is hugely fragmented
and needs to be streamlined. Checks and balances should ensure that existing
economies and jobs are not put at risk because one set of competing water
interests cries “foul” and blames the “fowls” or environmentalists without
regard to the bigger picture and the true economic impacts. While a Travis
County commissioner, I championed the economics of Central Texas’ water needs,
and we must consider similar economic priorities on the Gulf end of river
systems. Third, a healthy economy is directly tied to the prudent use of our
natural resources and how to best manage those for now and the future.
Texas has a water crisis and understanding
possible solutions requires voters to look beyond the faucets, the political
rhetoric and regionalism and work with local and state interests for balanced
solutions that work for all. If “Peter is robbed to pay Paul,” we all lose.
Huber is an advocate for sustainable and fair water
policy. She is a former Travis County
Commissioner and currently serves on the Texas A & M Sea Grant Program
Advisory Committee. Karen is an active
member of the Hill Country Alliance Water Team, a diverse group of science and
policy experts collaborating on Hill Country water issues.
Hill
Country Alliance is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to raise public
awareness and build community support around the need to preserve the natural
resources and heritage of the Central Texas Hill Country. To learn more about
Hill Country Alliance initiatives, please visit the HCA website www.hillcountryalliance.org
###
No comments:
Post a Comment