Buda Council makes waves with water contract
Much to the dismay of a
standing-room-only crowd at Buda City Hall, City Council members approved a
water supply contract Tuesday that would allow up to 1 million gallons per day
for city use from the Trinity Aquifer in western Hays County.
Electro Purification, the
Houston-based water supplier that is looking to extract water from the Cow
Creek Formation of the Middle Trinity Aquifer, also has agreements with the
Goforth Special Utility District and the developer of a future high-end,
2,200-home development in Mountain City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction for 3
million and 1.3 million gallons of water per day, respectively.
Many area residents and officials in
attendance at Tuesday night’s Buda Council meeting implored the elected
officials to delay action on the water supply contract and allow for the
dissemination and review of data surrounding the massive water-pumping project
in western Hays County.
Concerns about domestic Trinity
Aquifer wells going dry due to Electro Purification’s proposed well field have
run rampant throughout Hays County in recent weeks.
Eileen Conley, Buda business owner
and resident, told Council: “We do have an obligation to not take water from
our neighbors who are relying on that for life.”
Representing the Barton Springs
Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, board member Mary Stone asked Council to
delay a decision on the contract, due to limited data available and a request
to get one of their geoscientists to look at Electro Purification’s test wells
and explore the potential impacts to neighboring wells, as well as the aquifer
as a whole.
“Currently we have no site-specific
data of this area, and we are concerned of the potential impact of people that
live around that well site, as well as some of the area within the Trinity
[Aquifer],” Stone said.
But despite pleas from several Hays
County residents, the Barton Springs district and Hays County Commissioner Will
Conley, Council voted 6-1 to move forward with the execution of a water supply
contract. Buda’s agreement — unlike those with Goforth and Clark Wilson, the
developer of the proposed Anthem subdivision just outside Mountain City — will
have a mitigation clause in place that could put Electro Purification on the
hook to repair or alleviate affected surrounding wells.
Still, Council’s vote was met with
gasps, shock and nods of disapproval from those in attendance.
“I see some head-shaking out there
[in the audience],” said Buda Mayor Todd Ruge. “However, there are two
agreements already in place that do not have that mitigation plan as ours does.
We have actually provided extra protection for those folks out there as part of
the agreement, and that seemed to be the first question that came up tonight.”
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation
District President Linda Kaye Rogers, who had also asked for a delay of the
vote on the contract, said she was disappointed with Council’s decision.
“I am in tears,” she said. “I can’t
believe that they would do this — that they would defy the county
commissioners’ request, all the requests of the people that came in tonight —
and that they would go forward with inadequate and incomplete information. They
do not have all the information they need to make this decision.”
Council Member Angela Kennedy, who
cast the lone dissenting vote, said the residents who expressed worry had
legitimate concerns of domestic wells potentially running dry.
“The hydrogeologist that we hired
pretty much established that this project is going to have negative impacts on
the surrounding residential/domestic wells,” Kennedy told the Monitor,
adding that Buda has other opportunities for water supply and that she plainly
disagreed with contracting with an organization that could negatively affect
its residents and potentially impact sensitive environmental features like
Jacobs Well in Wimberley.
Bob Harden, a hydrologist the city
hired to review Electro Purification’s plan, told Council members that about 30
wells within 4 miles of the water supplier’s well field may see a decline of
artesian pressure of approximately 200 to 300 feet or more.
Harden said water levels may fall
below where the pumps are set in nearby domestic wells. However, he added, that
could easily be alleviated by lowering the pumps.
Barton Springs District General
Manager John Dupnik said that, in his estimation, it is quite likely that more
wells could be affected than those described by Harden, though he did not have
an exact number.
“It’s disappointing. Our board
formally requested some time to conduct a technical analysis of the data that
we just received on Friday [Jan. 16],” Dupnik said. “So we haven’t had the
opportunity to do that, we’re going to continue to do that, but I’m not sure
what effect it will have. These contracts are binding. The consequences are
still unknown to us.”
But the unknowns go beyond the
potential impacts to surrounding domestic and commercial wells.
“We haven’t proved up this thing
yet, [and] unless this thing proves up and we know we can take care of the
city’s needs, the contract won’t go through,” Electro Purification principal
Bart Fletcher told the Monitor.
Buda’s contract has an option period
that gives Electro Purification nine months to prove that its well field can
produce 5.65 million gallons of water per day, or MGD, which accounts for
Buda’s 1 MGD, plus a 25 percent contingency, and Goforth’s and Wilson’s agreed
amounts. If the company cannot provide the water quantity, then the city can
get out of the contract.
Per Buda’s agreement, the city will
pay $131,400 per year in reservation costs, and the company will have 18 months
to construct the infrastructure necessary to pipe the water east.
Once the water is able to be
delivered, Buda will pay a total of $658,825 in the first year of the 30-year
contract — $593,125 for take or pay of 0.50 MGD, and $65,700 for a reservation
fee for the remaining 0.50 MGD set aside for the city.
The first year’s delivery will
amount to only one-half million gallons per day, though that amount will rise
to the full 1 million MGD over five years, the agreement states.
Ruge said the city has spent about
$80,000 hiring attorneys, hydrologists and engineers to study the project.
“We are doing our homework on this,”
Ruge said. “When we enter into any kind of contract, we don’t take things like this
lightly.”
Buda was first approached by Electro
Purification in November 2011 to discuss a potential future water supply
agreement. The matter was revisited in 2013 and last September the council
directed staff to explore a contract for 1 MGD.
Buda Council makes waves with water contract
Much to the dismay of a standing-room-only crowd
at Buda City Hall, City Council members approved a water supply contract
Tuesday that would allow up to 1 million gallons per day for city use
from the Trinity Aquifer in western Hays County.
Electro Purification, the Houston-based water supplier that is looking to extract water from the Cow Creek Formation of the Middle Trinity Aquifer, also has agreements with the Goforth Special Utility District and the developer of a future high-end, 2,200-home development in Mountain City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction for 3 million and 1.3 million gallons of water per day, respectively.
Many area residents and officials in attendance at Tuesday night’s Buda Council meeting implored the elected officials to delay action on the water supply contract and allow for the dissemination and review of data surrounding the massive water-pumping project in western Hays County.
Concerns about domestic Trinity Aquifer wells going dry due to Electro Purification’s proposed well field have run rampant throughout Hays County in recent weeks.
Eileen Conley, Buda business owner and resident, told Council: “We do have an obligation to not take water from our neighbors who are relying on that for life.”
Representing the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, board member Mary Stone asked Council to delay a decision on the contract, due to limited data available and a request to get one of their geoscientists to look at Electro Purification’s test wells and explore the potential impacts to neighboring wells, as well as the aquifer as a whole.
“Currently we have no site-specific data of this area, and we are concerned of the potential impact of people that live around that well site, as well as some of the area within the Trinity [Aquifer],” Stone said.
But despite pleas from several Hays County residents, the Barton Springs district and Hays County Commissioner Will Conley, Council voted 6-1 to move forward with the execution of a water supply contract. Buda’s agreement — unlike those with Goforth and Clark Wilson, the developer of the proposed Anthem subdivision just outside Mountain City — will have a mitigation clause in place that could put Electro Purification on the hook to repair or alleviate affected surrounding wells.
Still, Council’s vote was met with gasps, shock and nods of disapproval from those in attendance.
“I see some head-shaking out there [in the audience],” said Buda Mayor Todd Ruge. “However, there are two agreements already in place that do not have that mitigation plan as ours does. We have actually provided extra protection for those folks out there as part of the agreement, and that seemed to be the first question that came up tonight.”
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District President Linda Kaye Rogers, who had also asked for a delay of the vote on the contract, said she was disappointed with Council’s decision.
“I am in tears,” she said. “I can’t believe that they would do this — that they would defy the county commissioners’ request, all the requests of the people that came in tonight — and that they would go forward with inadequate and incomplete information. They do not have all the information they need to make this decision.”
Council Member Angela Kennedy, who cast the lone dissenting vote, said the residents who expressed worry had legitimate concerns of domestic wells potentially running dry.
“The hydrogeologist that we hired pretty much established that this project is going to have negative impacts on the surrounding residential/domestic wells,” Kennedy told the Monitor, adding that Buda has other opportunities for water supply and that she plainly disagreed with contracting with an organization that could negatively affect its residents and potentially impact sensitive environmental features like Jacobs Well in Wimberley.
Bob Harden, a hydrologist the city hired to review Electro Purification’s plan, told Council members that about 30 wells within 4 miles of the water supplier’s well field may see a decline of artesian pressure of approximately 200 to 300 feet or more.
Harden said water levels may fall below where the pumps are set in nearby domestic wells. However, he added, that could easily be alleviated by lowering the pumps.
Barton Springs District General Manager John Dupnik said that, in his estimation, it is quite likely that more wells could be affected than those described by Harden, though he did not have an exact number.
“It’s disappointing. Our board formally requested some time to conduct a technical analysis of the data that we just received on Friday [Jan. 16],” Dupnik said. “So we haven’t had the opportunity to do that, we’re going to continue to do that, but I’m not sure what effect it will have. These contracts are binding. The consequences are still unknown to us.”
But the unknowns go beyond the potential impacts to surrounding domestic and commercial wells.
“We haven’t proved up this thing yet, [and] unless this thing proves up and we know we can take care of the city’s needs, the contract won’t go through,” Electro Purification principal Bart Fletcher told the Monitor.
Buda’s contract has an option period that gives Electro Purification nine months to prove that its well field can produce 5.65 million gallons of water per day, or MGD, which accounts for Buda’s 1 MGD, plus a 25 percent contingency, and Goforth’s and Wilson’s agreed amounts. If the company cannot provide the water quantity, then the city can get out of the contract.
Per Buda’s agreement, the city will pay $131,400 per year in reservation costs, and the company will have 18 months to construct the infrastructure necessary to pipe the water east.
Once the water is able to be delivered, Buda will pay a total of $658,825 in the first year of the 30-year contract — $593,125 for take or pay of 0.50 MGD, and $65,700 for a reservation fee for the remaining 0.50 MGD set aside for the city.
The first year’s delivery will amount to only one-half million gallons per day, though that amount will rise to the full 1 million MGD over five years, the agreement states.
Ruge said the city has spent about $80,000 hiring attorneys, hydrologists and engineers to study the project.
“We are doing our homework on this,” Ruge said. “When we enter into any kind of contract, we don’t take things like this lightly.”
Buda was first approached by Electro Purification in November 2011 to discuss a potential future water supply agreement. The matter was revisited in 2013 and last September the council directed staff to explore a contract for 1 MGD.
- See more at: http://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/2015/01/buda-makes-waves-with-water-contract/#sthash.hIjtayfO.dpufElectro Purification, the Houston-based water supplier that is looking to extract water from the Cow Creek Formation of the Middle Trinity Aquifer, also has agreements with the Goforth Special Utility District and the developer of a future high-end, 2,200-home development in Mountain City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction for 3 million and 1.3 million gallons of water per day, respectively.
Many area residents and officials in attendance at Tuesday night’s Buda Council meeting implored the elected officials to delay action on the water supply contract and allow for the dissemination and review of data surrounding the massive water-pumping project in western Hays County.
Concerns about domestic Trinity Aquifer wells going dry due to Electro Purification’s proposed well field have run rampant throughout Hays County in recent weeks.
Eileen Conley, Buda business owner and resident, told Council: “We do have an obligation to not take water from our neighbors who are relying on that for life.”
Representing the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, board member Mary Stone asked Council to delay a decision on the contract, due to limited data available and a request to get one of their geoscientists to look at Electro Purification’s test wells and explore the potential impacts to neighboring wells, as well as the aquifer as a whole.
“Currently we have no site-specific data of this area, and we are concerned of the potential impact of people that live around that well site, as well as some of the area within the Trinity [Aquifer],” Stone said.
But despite pleas from several Hays County residents, the Barton Springs district and Hays County Commissioner Will Conley, Council voted 6-1 to move forward with the execution of a water supply contract. Buda’s agreement — unlike those with Goforth and Clark Wilson, the developer of the proposed Anthem subdivision just outside Mountain City — will have a mitigation clause in place that could put Electro Purification on the hook to repair or alleviate affected surrounding wells.
Still, Council’s vote was met with gasps, shock and nods of disapproval from those in attendance.
“I see some head-shaking out there [in the audience],” said Buda Mayor Todd Ruge. “However, there are two agreements already in place that do not have that mitigation plan as ours does. We have actually provided extra protection for those folks out there as part of the agreement, and that seemed to be the first question that came up tonight.”
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District President Linda Kaye Rogers, who had also asked for a delay of the vote on the contract, said she was disappointed with Council’s decision.
“I am in tears,” she said. “I can’t believe that they would do this — that they would defy the county commissioners’ request, all the requests of the people that came in tonight — and that they would go forward with inadequate and incomplete information. They do not have all the information they need to make this decision.”
Council Member Angela Kennedy, who cast the lone dissenting vote, said the residents who expressed worry had legitimate concerns of domestic wells potentially running dry.
“The hydrogeologist that we hired pretty much established that this project is going to have negative impacts on the surrounding residential/domestic wells,” Kennedy told the Monitor, adding that Buda has other opportunities for water supply and that she plainly disagreed with contracting with an organization that could negatively affect its residents and potentially impact sensitive environmental features like Jacobs Well in Wimberley.
Bob Harden, a hydrologist the city hired to review Electro Purification’s plan, told Council members that about 30 wells within 4 miles of the water supplier’s well field may see a decline of artesian pressure of approximately 200 to 300 feet or more.
Harden said water levels may fall below where the pumps are set in nearby domestic wells. However, he added, that could easily be alleviated by lowering the pumps.
Barton Springs District General Manager John Dupnik said that, in his estimation, it is quite likely that more wells could be affected than those described by Harden, though he did not have an exact number.
“It’s disappointing. Our board formally requested some time to conduct a technical analysis of the data that we just received on Friday [Jan. 16],” Dupnik said. “So we haven’t had the opportunity to do that, we’re going to continue to do that, but I’m not sure what effect it will have. These contracts are binding. The consequences are still unknown to us.”
But the unknowns go beyond the potential impacts to surrounding domestic and commercial wells.
“We haven’t proved up this thing yet, [and] unless this thing proves up and we know we can take care of the city’s needs, the contract won’t go through,” Electro Purification principal Bart Fletcher told the Monitor.
Buda’s contract has an option period that gives Electro Purification nine months to prove that its well field can produce 5.65 million gallons of water per day, or MGD, which accounts for Buda’s 1 MGD, plus a 25 percent contingency, and Goforth’s and Wilson’s agreed amounts. If the company cannot provide the water quantity, then the city can get out of the contract.
Per Buda’s agreement, the city will pay $131,400 per year in reservation costs, and the company will have 18 months to construct the infrastructure necessary to pipe the water east.
Once the water is able to be delivered, Buda will pay a total of $658,825 in the first year of the 30-year contract — $593,125 for take or pay of 0.50 MGD, and $65,700 for a reservation fee for the remaining 0.50 MGD set aside for the city.
The first year’s delivery will amount to only one-half million gallons per day, though that amount will rise to the full 1 million MGD over five years, the agreement states.
Ruge said the city has spent about $80,000 hiring attorneys, hydrologists and engineers to study the project.
“We are doing our homework on this,” Ruge said. “When we enter into any kind of contract, we don’t take things like this lightly.”
Buda was first approached by Electro Purification in November 2011 to discuss a potential future water supply agreement. The matter was revisited in 2013 and last September the council directed staff to explore a contract for 1 MGD.
Buda Council makes waves with water contract
Much to the dismay of a standing-room-only crowd
at Buda City Hall, City Council members approved a water supply contract
Tuesday that would allow up to 1 million gallons per day for city use
from the Trinity Aquifer in western Hays County.
Electro Purification, the Houston-based water supplier that is looking to extract water from the Cow Creek Formation of the Middle Trinity Aquifer, also has agreements with the Goforth Special Utility District and the developer of a future high-end, 2,200-home development in Mountain City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction for 3 million and 1.3 million gallons of water per day, respectively.
Many area residents and officials in attendance at Tuesday night’s Buda Council meeting implored the elected officials to delay action on the water supply contract and allow for the dissemination and review of data surrounding the massive water-pumping project in western Hays County.
Concerns about domestic Trinity Aquifer wells going dry due to Electro Purification’s proposed well field have run rampant throughout Hays County in recent weeks.
Eileen Conley, Buda business owner and resident, told Council: “We do have an obligation to not take water from our neighbors who are relying on that for life.”
Representing the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, board member Mary Stone asked Council to delay a decision on the contract, due to limited data available and a request to get one of their geoscientists to look at Electro Purification’s test wells and explore the potential impacts to neighboring wells, as well as the aquifer as a whole.
“Currently we have no site-specific data of this area, and we are concerned of the potential impact of people that live around that well site, as well as some of the area within the Trinity [Aquifer],” Stone said.
But despite pleas from several Hays County residents, the Barton Springs district and Hays County Commissioner Will Conley, Council voted 6-1 to move forward with the execution of a water supply contract. Buda’s agreement — unlike those with Goforth and Clark Wilson, the developer of the proposed Anthem subdivision just outside Mountain City — will have a mitigation clause in place that could put Electro Purification on the hook to repair or alleviate affected surrounding wells.
Still, Council’s vote was met with gasps, shock and nods of disapproval from those in attendance.
“I see some head-shaking out there [in the audience],” said Buda Mayor Todd Ruge. “However, there are two agreements already in place that do not have that mitigation plan as ours does. We have actually provided extra protection for those folks out there as part of the agreement, and that seemed to be the first question that came up tonight.”
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District President Linda Kaye Rogers, who had also asked for a delay of the vote on the contract, said she was disappointed with Council’s decision.
“I am in tears,” she said. “I can’t believe that they would do this — that they would defy the county commissioners’ request, all the requests of the people that came in tonight — and that they would go forward with inadequate and incomplete information. They do not have all the information they need to make this decision.”
Council Member Angela Kennedy, who cast the lone dissenting vote, said the residents who expressed worry had legitimate concerns of domestic wells potentially running dry.
“The hydrogeologist that we hired pretty much established that this project is going to have negative impacts on the surrounding residential/domestic wells,” Kennedy told the Monitor, adding that Buda has other opportunities for water supply and that she plainly disagreed with contracting with an organization that could negatively affect its residents and potentially impact sensitive environmental features like Jacobs Well in Wimberley.
Bob Harden, a hydrologist the city hired to review Electro Purification’s plan, told Council members that about 30 wells within 4 miles of the water supplier’s well field may see a decline of artesian pressure of approximately 200 to 300 feet or more.
Harden said water levels may fall below where the pumps are set in nearby domestic wells. However, he added, that could easily be alleviated by lowering the pumps.
Barton Springs District General Manager John Dupnik said that, in his estimation, it is quite likely that more wells could be affected than those described by Harden, though he did not have an exact number.
“It’s disappointing. Our board formally requested some time to conduct a technical analysis of the data that we just received on Friday [Jan. 16],” Dupnik said. “So we haven’t had the opportunity to do that, we’re going to continue to do that, but I’m not sure what effect it will have. These contracts are binding. The consequences are still unknown to us.”
But the unknowns go beyond the potential impacts to surrounding domestic and commercial wells.
“We haven’t proved up this thing yet, [and] unless this thing proves up and we know we can take care of the city’s needs, the contract won’t go through,” Electro Purification principal Bart Fletcher told the Monitor.
Buda’s contract has an option period that gives Electro Purification nine months to prove that its well field can produce 5.65 million gallons of water per day, or MGD, which accounts for Buda’s 1 MGD, plus a 25 percent contingency, and Goforth’s and Wilson’s agreed amounts. If the company cannot provide the water quantity, then the city can get out of the contract.
Per Buda’s agreement, the city will pay $131,400 per year in reservation costs, and the company will have 18 months to construct the infrastructure necessary to pipe the water east.
Once the water is able to be delivered, Buda will pay a total of $658,825 in the first year of the 30-year contract — $593,125 for take or pay of 0.50 MGD, and $65,700 for a reservation fee for the remaining 0.50 MGD set aside for the city.
The first year’s delivery will amount to only one-half million gallons per day, though that amount will rise to the full 1 million MGD over five years, the agreement states.
Ruge said the city has spent about $80,000 hiring attorneys, hydrologists and engineers to study the project.
“We are doing our homework on this,” Ruge said. “When we enter into any kind of contract, we don’t take things like this lightly.”
Buda was first approached by Electro Purification in November 2011 to discuss a potential future water supply agreement. The matter was revisited in 2013 and last September the council directed staff to explore a contract for 1 MGD.
- See more at: http://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/2015/01/buda-makes-waves-with-water-contract/#sthash.hIjtayfO.dpufElectro Purification, the Houston-based water supplier that is looking to extract water from the Cow Creek Formation of the Middle Trinity Aquifer, also has agreements with the Goforth Special Utility District and the developer of a future high-end, 2,200-home development in Mountain City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction for 3 million and 1.3 million gallons of water per day, respectively.
Many area residents and officials in attendance at Tuesday night’s Buda Council meeting implored the elected officials to delay action on the water supply contract and allow for the dissemination and review of data surrounding the massive water-pumping project in western Hays County.
Concerns about domestic Trinity Aquifer wells going dry due to Electro Purification’s proposed well field have run rampant throughout Hays County in recent weeks.
Eileen Conley, Buda business owner and resident, told Council: “We do have an obligation to not take water from our neighbors who are relying on that for life.”
Representing the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, board member Mary Stone asked Council to delay a decision on the contract, due to limited data available and a request to get one of their geoscientists to look at Electro Purification’s test wells and explore the potential impacts to neighboring wells, as well as the aquifer as a whole.
“Currently we have no site-specific data of this area, and we are concerned of the potential impact of people that live around that well site, as well as some of the area within the Trinity [Aquifer],” Stone said.
But despite pleas from several Hays County residents, the Barton Springs district and Hays County Commissioner Will Conley, Council voted 6-1 to move forward with the execution of a water supply contract. Buda’s agreement — unlike those with Goforth and Clark Wilson, the developer of the proposed Anthem subdivision just outside Mountain City — will have a mitigation clause in place that could put Electro Purification on the hook to repair or alleviate affected surrounding wells.
Still, Council’s vote was met with gasps, shock and nods of disapproval from those in attendance.
“I see some head-shaking out there [in the audience],” said Buda Mayor Todd Ruge. “However, there are two agreements already in place that do not have that mitigation plan as ours does. We have actually provided extra protection for those folks out there as part of the agreement, and that seemed to be the first question that came up tonight.”
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District President Linda Kaye Rogers, who had also asked for a delay of the vote on the contract, said she was disappointed with Council’s decision.
“I am in tears,” she said. “I can’t believe that they would do this — that they would defy the county commissioners’ request, all the requests of the people that came in tonight — and that they would go forward with inadequate and incomplete information. They do not have all the information they need to make this decision.”
Council Member Angela Kennedy, who cast the lone dissenting vote, said the residents who expressed worry had legitimate concerns of domestic wells potentially running dry.
“The hydrogeologist that we hired pretty much established that this project is going to have negative impacts on the surrounding residential/domestic wells,” Kennedy told the Monitor, adding that Buda has other opportunities for water supply and that she plainly disagreed with contracting with an organization that could negatively affect its residents and potentially impact sensitive environmental features like Jacobs Well in Wimberley.
Bob Harden, a hydrologist the city hired to review Electro Purification’s plan, told Council members that about 30 wells within 4 miles of the water supplier’s well field may see a decline of artesian pressure of approximately 200 to 300 feet or more.
Harden said water levels may fall below where the pumps are set in nearby domestic wells. However, he added, that could easily be alleviated by lowering the pumps.
Barton Springs District General Manager John Dupnik said that, in his estimation, it is quite likely that more wells could be affected than those described by Harden, though he did not have an exact number.
“It’s disappointing. Our board formally requested some time to conduct a technical analysis of the data that we just received on Friday [Jan. 16],” Dupnik said. “So we haven’t had the opportunity to do that, we’re going to continue to do that, but I’m not sure what effect it will have. These contracts are binding. The consequences are still unknown to us.”
But the unknowns go beyond the potential impacts to surrounding domestic and commercial wells.
“We haven’t proved up this thing yet, [and] unless this thing proves up and we know we can take care of the city’s needs, the contract won’t go through,” Electro Purification principal Bart Fletcher told the Monitor.
Buda’s contract has an option period that gives Electro Purification nine months to prove that its well field can produce 5.65 million gallons of water per day, or MGD, which accounts for Buda’s 1 MGD, plus a 25 percent contingency, and Goforth’s and Wilson’s agreed amounts. If the company cannot provide the water quantity, then the city can get out of the contract.
Per Buda’s agreement, the city will pay $131,400 per year in reservation costs, and the company will have 18 months to construct the infrastructure necessary to pipe the water east.
Once the water is able to be delivered, Buda will pay a total of $658,825 in the first year of the 30-year contract — $593,125 for take or pay of 0.50 MGD, and $65,700 for a reservation fee for the remaining 0.50 MGD set aside for the city.
The first year’s delivery will amount to only one-half million gallons per day, though that amount will rise to the full 1 million MGD over five years, the agreement states.
Ruge said the city has spent about $80,000 hiring attorneys, hydrologists and engineers to study the project.
“We are doing our homework on this,” Ruge said. “When we enter into any kind of contract, we don’t take things like this lightly.”
Buda was first approached by Electro Purification in November 2011 to discuss a potential future water supply agreement. The matter was revisited in 2013 and last September the council directed staff to explore a contract for 1 MGD.
Buda Council makes waves with water contract
Much to the dismay of a standing-room-only crowd
at Buda City Hall, City Council members approved a water supply contract
Tuesday that would allow up to 1 million gallons per day for city use
from the Trinity Aquifer in western Hays County.
Electro Purification, the Houston-based water supplier that is looking to extract water from the Cow Creek Formation of the Middle Trinity Aquifer, also has agreements with the Goforth Special Utility District and the developer of a future high-end, 2,200-home development in Mountain City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction for 3 million and 1.3 million gallons of water per day, respectively.
Many area residents and officials in attendance at Tuesday night’s Buda Council meeting implored the elected officials to delay action on the water supply contract and allow for the dissemination and review of data surrounding the massive water-pumping project in western Hays County.
Concerns about domestic Trinity Aquifer wells going dry due to Electro Purification’s proposed well field have run rampant throughout Hays County in recent weeks.
Eileen Conley, Buda business owner and resident, told Council: “We do have an obligation to not take water from our neighbors who are relying on that for life.”
Representing the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, board member Mary Stone asked Council to delay a decision on the contract, due to limited data available and a request to get one of their geoscientists to look at Electro Purification’s test wells and explore the potential impacts to neighboring wells, as well as the aquifer as a whole.
“Currently we have no site-specific data of this area, and we are concerned of the potential impact of people that live around that well site, as well as some of the area within the Trinity [Aquifer],” Stone said.
But despite pleas from several Hays County residents, the Barton Springs district and Hays County Commissioner Will Conley, Council voted 6-1 to move forward with the execution of a water supply contract. Buda’s agreement — unlike those with Goforth and Clark Wilson, the developer of the proposed Anthem subdivision just outside Mountain City — will have a mitigation clause in place that could put Electro Purification on the hook to repair or alleviate affected surrounding wells.
Still, Council’s vote was met with gasps, shock and nods of disapproval from those in attendance.
“I see some head-shaking out there [in the audience],” said Buda Mayor Todd Ruge. “However, there are two agreements already in place that do not have that mitigation plan as ours does. We have actually provided extra protection for those folks out there as part of the agreement, and that seemed to be the first question that came up tonight.”
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District President Linda Kaye Rogers, who had also asked for a delay of the vote on the contract, said she was disappointed with Council’s decision.
“I am in tears,” she said. “I can’t believe that they would do this — that they would defy the county commissioners’ request, all the requests of the people that came in tonight — and that they would go forward with inadequate and incomplete information. They do not have all the information they need to make this decision.”
Council Member Angela Kennedy, who cast the lone dissenting vote, said the residents who expressed worry had legitimate concerns of domestic wells potentially running dry.
“The hydrogeologist that we hired pretty much established that this project is going to have negative impacts on the surrounding residential/domestic wells,” Kennedy told the Monitor, adding that Buda has other opportunities for water supply and that she plainly disagreed with contracting with an organization that could negatively affect its residents and potentially impact sensitive environmental features like Jacobs Well in Wimberley.
Bob Harden, a hydrologist the city hired to review Electro Purification’s plan, told Council members that about 30 wells within 4 miles of the water supplier’s well field may see a decline of artesian pressure of approximately 200 to 300 feet or more.
Harden said water levels may fall below where the pumps are set in nearby domestic wells. However, he added, that could easily be alleviated by lowering the pumps.
Barton Springs District General Manager John Dupnik said that, in his estimation, it is quite likely that more wells could be affected than those described by Harden, though he did not have an exact number.
“It’s disappointing. Our board formally requested some time to conduct a technical analysis of the data that we just received on Friday [Jan. 16],” Dupnik said. “So we haven’t had the opportunity to do that, we’re going to continue to do that, but I’m not sure what effect it will have. These contracts are binding. The consequences are still unknown to us.”
But the unknowns go beyond the potential impacts to surrounding domestic and commercial wells.
“We haven’t proved up this thing yet, [and] unless this thing proves up and we know we can take care of the city’s needs, the contract won’t go through,” Electro Purification principal Bart Fletcher told the Monitor.
Buda’s contract has an option period that gives Electro Purification nine months to prove that its well field can produce 5.65 million gallons of water per day, or MGD, which accounts for Buda’s 1 MGD, plus a 25 percent contingency, and Goforth’s and Wilson’s agreed amounts. If the company cannot provide the water quantity, then the city can get out of the contract.
Per Buda’s agreement, the city will pay $131,400 per year in reservation costs, and the company will have 18 months to construct the infrastructure necessary to pipe the water east.
Once the water is able to be delivered, Buda will pay a total of $658,825 in the first year of the 30-year contract — $593,125 for take or pay of 0.50 MGD, and $65,700 for a reservation fee for the remaining 0.50 MGD set aside for the city.
The first year’s delivery will amount to only one-half million gallons per day, though that amount will rise to the full 1 million MGD over five years, the agreement states.
Ruge said the city has spent about $80,000 hiring attorneys, hydrologists and engineers to study the project.
“We are doing our homework on this,” Ruge said. “When we enter into any kind of contract, we don’t take things like this lightly.”
Buda was first approached by Electro Purification in November 2011 to discuss a potential future water supply agreement. The matter was revisited in 2013 and last September the council directed staff to explore a contract for 1 MGD.
- See more at: http://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/2015/01/buda-makes-waves-with-water-contract/#sthash.hIjtayfO.dpufElectro Purification, the Houston-based water supplier that is looking to extract water from the Cow Creek Formation of the Middle Trinity Aquifer, also has agreements with the Goforth Special Utility District and the developer of a future high-end, 2,200-home development in Mountain City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction for 3 million and 1.3 million gallons of water per day, respectively.
Many area residents and officials in attendance at Tuesday night’s Buda Council meeting implored the elected officials to delay action on the water supply contract and allow for the dissemination and review of data surrounding the massive water-pumping project in western Hays County.
Concerns about domestic Trinity Aquifer wells going dry due to Electro Purification’s proposed well field have run rampant throughout Hays County in recent weeks.
Eileen Conley, Buda business owner and resident, told Council: “We do have an obligation to not take water from our neighbors who are relying on that for life.”
Representing the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, board member Mary Stone asked Council to delay a decision on the contract, due to limited data available and a request to get one of their geoscientists to look at Electro Purification’s test wells and explore the potential impacts to neighboring wells, as well as the aquifer as a whole.
“Currently we have no site-specific data of this area, and we are concerned of the potential impact of people that live around that well site, as well as some of the area within the Trinity [Aquifer],” Stone said.
But despite pleas from several Hays County residents, the Barton Springs district and Hays County Commissioner Will Conley, Council voted 6-1 to move forward with the execution of a water supply contract. Buda’s agreement — unlike those with Goforth and Clark Wilson, the developer of the proposed Anthem subdivision just outside Mountain City — will have a mitigation clause in place that could put Electro Purification on the hook to repair or alleviate affected surrounding wells.
Still, Council’s vote was met with gasps, shock and nods of disapproval from those in attendance.
“I see some head-shaking out there [in the audience],” said Buda Mayor Todd Ruge. “However, there are two agreements already in place that do not have that mitigation plan as ours does. We have actually provided extra protection for those folks out there as part of the agreement, and that seemed to be the first question that came up tonight.”
Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District President Linda Kaye Rogers, who had also asked for a delay of the vote on the contract, said she was disappointed with Council’s decision.
“I am in tears,” she said. “I can’t believe that they would do this — that they would defy the county commissioners’ request, all the requests of the people that came in tonight — and that they would go forward with inadequate and incomplete information. They do not have all the information they need to make this decision.”
Council Member Angela Kennedy, who cast the lone dissenting vote, said the residents who expressed worry had legitimate concerns of domestic wells potentially running dry.
“The hydrogeologist that we hired pretty much established that this project is going to have negative impacts on the surrounding residential/domestic wells,” Kennedy told the Monitor, adding that Buda has other opportunities for water supply and that she plainly disagreed with contracting with an organization that could negatively affect its residents and potentially impact sensitive environmental features like Jacobs Well in Wimberley.
Bob Harden, a hydrologist the city hired to review Electro Purification’s plan, told Council members that about 30 wells within 4 miles of the water supplier’s well field may see a decline of artesian pressure of approximately 200 to 300 feet or more.
Harden said water levels may fall below where the pumps are set in nearby domestic wells. However, he added, that could easily be alleviated by lowering the pumps.
Barton Springs District General Manager John Dupnik said that, in his estimation, it is quite likely that more wells could be affected than those described by Harden, though he did not have an exact number.
“It’s disappointing. Our board formally requested some time to conduct a technical analysis of the data that we just received on Friday [Jan. 16],” Dupnik said. “So we haven’t had the opportunity to do that, we’re going to continue to do that, but I’m not sure what effect it will have. These contracts are binding. The consequences are still unknown to us.”
But the unknowns go beyond the potential impacts to surrounding domestic and commercial wells.
“We haven’t proved up this thing yet, [and] unless this thing proves up and we know we can take care of the city’s needs, the contract won’t go through,” Electro Purification principal Bart Fletcher told the Monitor.
Buda’s contract has an option period that gives Electro Purification nine months to prove that its well field can produce 5.65 million gallons of water per day, or MGD, which accounts for Buda’s 1 MGD, plus a 25 percent contingency, and Goforth’s and Wilson’s agreed amounts. If the company cannot provide the water quantity, then the city can get out of the contract.
Per Buda’s agreement, the city will pay $131,400 per year in reservation costs, and the company will have 18 months to construct the infrastructure necessary to pipe the water east.
Once the water is able to be delivered, Buda will pay a total of $658,825 in the first year of the 30-year contract — $593,125 for take or pay of 0.50 MGD, and $65,700 for a reservation fee for the remaining 0.50 MGD set aside for the city.
The first year’s delivery will amount to only one-half million gallons per day, though that amount will rise to the full 1 million MGD over five years, the agreement states.
Ruge said the city has spent about $80,000 hiring attorneys, hydrologists and engineers to study the project.
“We are doing our homework on this,” Ruge said. “When we enter into any kind of contract, we don’t take things like this lightly.”
Buda was first approached by Electro Purification in November 2011 to discuss a potential future water supply agreement. The matter was revisited in 2013 and last September the council directed staff to explore a contract for 1 MGD.
If you are looking for home & office bottled water in San Antonio then Artesia springs is the end destination for you which provides purified bottled water. For more details please visit our website http://www.artesiasprings.com or call us at (210) 637-5554
ReplyDelete