Dear GEAA members and friends,
Yesterday, I received news that Senator Donna Campbell has permission to introduce SB 2075 to strip the power of eminent domain from the Needmore Ranch Municipal Utility District (MUD).
The Needmore
Ranch MUD has been a tremendously controversial development planned to
add thousands of new homes in Wimberley Valley in Hays County, one of
the fastest-growing counties in the nation. According to this report in the Texas Observer,
“Between 1980 and 2012, Hays county’s population more than quadrupled,
from 41,000 to 169,000. The mostly rural portion of the county west of
I-35 could triple again by 2060, according to population estimates. A
2011 report on water and wastewater commissioned by Hays County states
flatly: “The ambience and sustainable picture desired by many in western
Hays County is likely only achievable if growth is somehow
significantly limited or is channeled into certain development areas.”
In other words, limits on and patterns of development should be
determined by water.
According to
the legislation that set up this MUD, the Needmore MUD would be able to
condemn land only for the “purpose of importing surface water into the
district.”
While Senator
Campbell and Representative Isaac filed the legislation in 2013 that
originally created the Needmore Ranch MUD, we are gratified to learn
that Senator Campbell has been persuaded that the powers granted, in
this case eminent domain, are too broad - empowering the MUD to take
actions that might not be in the best interests of the community and
neighboring landowners.
Here is her bill in its entirety:
We have seen
similar problems with MUDs being played out over and over. MUD’s create
huge problems in the Hill Country because they are completely
developer-driven. The structure by which MUD’s are created for
developers leaves the community with several different financial
burdens. Developers are constantly seeking different ways to lower
their investment. A common method for developers is to build MUD’s and
Water Control Improvement Districts (WCID’s) using old and less
efficient sewage treatment technology in order to lower the cost of the
development. In the case of the poorly built districts, the community
is then left with the financial burden to operate and maintain the
cheap, less efficient sewage infrastructure created by the developer.
GEAA is very concerned about the negative impact to our ground water
from poorly designed sewage infrastructure. Over the years we have
joined with groups in Comal, Hays, Bexar, and Medina counties to contest
permits for substandard sewage infrastructure that would impact the
Edwards Aquifer.
Another reason
why developer-driven MUD’s and WCID’s present a problem to the Texas
Hill Country is the sheer size of the communities that are being
developed. Many of these are high density developments located in
environmentally sensitive areas. New MUDs will add tens of thousands of
new water connections in areas already having problems with water
availability. We are aware of legislation to create at least five new
MUDs in the Hill Country this session.
GEAA is
requesting an interim hearing on the powers granted by the legislature
to Municipal Utility Districts. Please join us by contacting your State
Representatives, Senators, and Speaker Joe Straus (joe.straus@speaker.state.tx.us) to request an interim hearing on the powers granted to Municipal Utility Districts.
The time to act on this is now.
Thank you,
Annalisa Peace
Executive Director
Greater Edwards Aquifer Alliance
Check out GEAA’s Legislative Agenda for the 84th session and a list of the bills we support and oppose.
You can always keep up with interesting water news on GEAA's Face Book page
and, you can donate to GEAA on line or mail contributions to support GEAA to PO Box 15618, San Antonio, Texas 78212
bigg boss season 9 live feeds
ReplyDeletewho will win bigg boss 9